🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just the winner overall, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and most voters leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes added later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year backed the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However no, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.